是一个 论点分析平台。

统计

Argüman has too few fallacies to pick from

因为
It is true. Also, the link to wikipedia doesn't even show the same list and many fallacies aren't even explained.
3 支持者。
27 谬误报告。
诡辩的谬误
虚假原因谬误
不相关的谬误
扣帽子
滑坡谬误
诉诸人身
联合效应
先前的谬误
错误类比
是与应该谬误
语用谬误
连续体谬误
诉诸怜悯
诉诸权威
烟雾弹
乞求论点
偏见的语言
暴力说服
不相关的结论
因果倒置
诉诸信念
懒于归纳

There is no such thing as global warming.

因为
It's actually climate change
18 支持者。
14 谬误报告。
因果倒置
诡辩的谬误
连续体谬误
不相关的谬误
联合效应
错误类比
烟雾弹
是与应该谬误
乞求论点
语用谬误
扣帽子
诉诸信念
懒于归纳
诉诸人身

arguman > r/changemyview

然而
Other flaws with Arguman include: 1) No way to weed out troll comments. Even if multiple fallacies are reported, their comments are never hidden. 2) Fallacies are reported inaccurately, most likely just when someone disagrees even though there may not be an actual fallacy.
3 支持者。
14 谬误报告。
烟雾弹
连续体谬误
诉诸权威
偏见的语言
联合效应
乞求论点
因果倒置
扣帽子
不相关的结论
语用谬误
诉诸信念
暴力说服
懒于归纳

Transgender people should not share locker rooms or public restrooms with those whom they simply identify as

然而
I'm not taking place in your de bait
11 谬误报告。
烟雾弹
连续体谬误
虚假原因谬误
不相关的谬误
联合效应
先前的谬误
因果倒置
扣帽子
不相关的结论
滑坡谬误
诉诸人身

你们应该怼饱醉豚,而不是去怼简书。简书没毛病。

但是
问题是你想用twitter举例,说明国外月亮比较圆,国外都是怼川普没人怼twitter这个平台,来说明国人也应该怼饱醉豚不应该怼简书。如果是这个意思,我上面的意思是,twitter也是会删除言论的,国外也有人认为twitter应该删除某些有害信息,所以你的论据不成立;如果不是这个意思,请说明你上面引入twitter想通过什么来论证你的观点。
6 谬误报告。
虚假原因谬误
不相关的谬误
先前的谬误
烟雾弹
扣帽子
偏见的语言

There is no such thing as global warming.

然而
If your approach is to simply dismiss any enigmatic or unexpected observations you run across, then your conclusions will simply reflect these decisions about your focus.
10 谬误报告。
不相关的结论
虚假原因谬误
不相关的谬误
先前的谬误
扣帽子
乞求论点
语用谬误
滑坡谬误
诉诸信念
诉诸人身

PC is better than consoles

但是
PC gamers introduce the most stigma into this industry. Gamers who don't want to involve themselves with Nazi association, social ineptness, misogyny or the entirety of World of Warcraft shouldn't game on PC. Instead they should play cool people games such as Street Fighter and Wii Sports.
10 谬误报告。
诡辩的谬误
不相关的结论
诉诸怜悯
偏见的语言
烟雾弹
扣帽子
诉诸信念
诉诸人身

A creator must exist

因为
I created this post. At least one creator exists in this point of time.
7 谬误报告。
乞求论点
错误类比

你们应该怼饱醉豚,而不是去怼简书。简书没毛病。

但是
所以你只是说一个个例,这个能说明什么?还是说是希望!大家像这个个例中一样,去抨击个人,不要去抨击平台?
4 谬误报告。
烟雾弹
诡辩的谬误
暴力说服
不相关的结论

The government should be required to use open source software (for civilian operations at least)

但是
It would turn us all into communists
5 谬误报告。
扣帽子
不相关的结论
滑坡谬误
诉诸信念