History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

You have made up something called 'white privilege', just how I could make up the existence of Zeus and invoke him into my argument. You haven't explained anything, I'm an empiricist - can you measure White privilege? esp. in ancient times.I cannot measure Zeus's existence therefore I cannot use him

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

No, efficiency necessarily demands an accurate price discovery mechanism. This is not a trivial problem. Capitalism solves it - Communism pretends it doesn't exist and then finds out the Economy is outputting <10% of what it should be doing because of hidden costs. USSR was a staggering waste
6 支持者。

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

Capital costs are a valuable contribution, by owning the equipment and ordering food stocks you expose yourself to risk that the chef does not have to endure. It is an extremely fair system and an engine for great prosperity as anyone can sell their labor to a consumer through a Capitaled business.

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

Let me give a clear example: Imagine a Restaurant. The customer purchases from the Chef his skilled labor for a period of time, he also purchases from the Business owner the ingredients and the lease of the equipment (kitchen & cookers) for the duration. This is packaged into a simple product.

The Holocaust didn't happen

Holocaust belief is analogous to middle age Christianity. You would be heretical for questioning God's existence back then and you would also have everyone you know tell you that God exists. It is a religion, one that has gone unclassified. It is used to extract tithes (Israel) and reverence.

The Holocaust didn't happen

It's foundational evidence is as tautological as the Bible, we believe the Holocaust happened because we are told, and that is what it says in Elie Wiesel's novels and our 'approved' History books. 'We believe the Holocaust because it is true'. It has been used to elevate Jews to a 'priest class'.

The Holocaust didn't happen

All the feelings you are having right now are exactly identical to a Christian from the middle ages hearing someone question whether God exists or not. It is blasphemy to you that makes me a heretic. Holocaust has original sin (white guilt), it has priests (Jews),it is taught in schools to our young
1 支持者。

The Holocaust didn't happen

I am also drawing your attention to the apparent fact that you and many westerners have been programmed to react with particular single-mindedness to the Holocaust - when it doesn't deserve it taken objectively - no other group uses a genocide to gain so much and control so many. Holocaust=religion.
2 支持者。

The Holocaust didn't happen

No-one deserves genocide. No living Jew deserves scorn for the slave trade. What I am illustrating is that you have a visceral defensive reaction against the Holocaust as though 6 million Jews are more important than 110 million africans, or the 85-100 million non-Jews under Communist genocide.
2 支持者。

There are now two kinds of Muslims; those who prefer governance through secular liberal democracy and those who prefer governance through Sharia law.

That was only 10 years ago.

There are now two kinds of Muslims; those who prefer governance through secular liberal democracy and those who prefer governance through Sharia law.

When I grew up, in the UK, I had a close friend of mine from Persia (now Iran) - He always told me over and over that Islam took over his country and they fled - he said he really hopes it doesn't happen to the UK too - I listened but was doubtful such a thing would happen. He was 100% right.

There are now two kinds of Muslims; those who prefer governance through secular liberal democracy and those who prefer governance through Sharia law.

The real enemy of the west is the one within. The left wing guarantees Radical Islam will destroy western nations. Islam has a practiced method of subversion of a strong nation - it has been carried out in Iran and other middle east countries throughout history and the left allowed Europe to be next
1 支持者。

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

No, because that fallacy makes you believe the laborer takes credit for the result in it's totality which is not true. The consumer is buying the ingredients AND the worker's labor to make the product from those ingredients. There is a far more direct relationship between consumer and laborer.

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

'Great Civilization' history does consist of just a handful of cultures - Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, Renaissance Europe, British Empire, Post-1900 United States. These were the petri dishes in which great paradigms were formed and spread to the world.

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

Great civilizations are the true historical winners that should deserve praise. Why was the Computer not developed in non-white countries? Why was the Industrial revolution not shared with the world from China or India? Why was the theory of Evolution or Relativity achieved in white society?
1 谬误报告。
乞求论点

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

Mediocre Civilizations are not worthy of significant documentation in the annals of history - it should be meritocratic in order to spur on advancement.

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

History means 'heroic acts' - it is an appeal to the greatness possible in all men, I defined the premise as 'Great Civilizations' - I am still confident in my conclusion that great civilizations were predominantly white - they pushed all the world forward, this should deserve praise.

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

Indians who have studied history express gratitude for what European colonialism did to bootstrap and improve what was Indian civilization beforehand. It was more like an investment-venture, Britain actually spent more money on India than they got out - by design. It was deemed the right thing to do

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

The silk road is an example of how it didn't - silk road trade came about because non-whites had resources whites didn't. Also a pre-eminent example would be British India - India failed to make a strong nation, Britain improved India the same way Alexander Great laid foundations across Persia.

History is the repeating story of the White race building great Civilizations and pushing Humanity forwards, only to import other races and miscegenerate with them - whereupon the Civilization crumbles and destroys itself.

Privilege is a word of comedy, not a word of philosophy. It is like me saying 'White people can't dance properly' - as though that's an argument. Privilege does not impart any information whatsoever as you have used it - it is like say 'White people had Zeus on their side'. You must do better.